This newsletter is about the flipside of a 
subject that gets a lot of attention when the subject of recruitment interviews 
is raised. i.e. how to overcome nerves, lack of confidence, presentation skills 
and so on. The flip-side is being over-confident.
It is our observation that a good many position 
opportunities are lost by candidates coming across as over-confident, even 
arrogant in their assumption that they are the best person for the role and that 
the application/interview process is somehow a mere formality.

 
This over-confidence comes across in many ways. 
Starting with lack of preparation – "I can wing it" – and continuing on to 
making assumptions about the role, the interviewer(s) and the 
company.
The trouble with over-confidence is that the 
impression taken from it can vary enormously. For example, not taking the 
trouble to do your homework on a company can be interpreted by the interviewer 
in a number of ways. 
For example: 
• Lazy. This candidate is just plain lazy because 
he/she hasn’t shown the courtesy of learning anything about the company. 
• Stupidity. For overlooking the need to 
research. 
• Arrogance. "I am so good that they will employ 
me regardless of the state of my ignorance".
Over-confidence can also extend into your 
perceived attitude about the role – being over-confident may lead you down the 
route of appearing uninterested or diffident about the role. It can send all the 
wrong signals to the interviewer. 
Employers are always on the look-out for people 
who are really keen to take on a role. Being keen, even anxious gives an edge to 
an interview that conveys this attitude. Whereas being over-confident or too 
relaxed robs you of this edge and can give the impression that you are not 
really interested.
 
Signs of over-confidence that are apparent to an 
interviewer include:
• Not asking any questions about the 
role. 
• An aggressive or shambolic posture.
• Dressing inappropriately for the role 
sought.
• A demeanour that is too casual for the role 
sought
• Talking over the interviewer, not 
listening
• Self importance/overselling
• Not bothering to prepare a cover letter or 
getting by on an inadequate resume.
The reverse of the above points is the answer to 
the problem of over-confidence. You should always seek to:
• At the appropriate time politely ask questions 
about the role and the company.
• Sit upright with a posture that displays alert 
keenness.
• Dress to the standard of the 
interviewer.
• Never talk over the interviewer.
• Be humble rather than proud and don’t over sell 
yourself.
• Always send a cover letter that addresses the 
criteria of the role and make sure your resume is an up-to-date one. 
Note: If there is a consultants name in the 
advertisement for the role, then make sure you use it in addressing the cover 
letter. Small courtesies can yield good 
results.
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
Up 
until 10 years ago, the popular image of an expatriate role, was one of a high 
salary and a package of tax free or low taxed benefits, such as: accommodation, 
company car, driver, schooling for children, maids etc. A thrifty "expat", could 
do quite well on a good package, with few outlays and the consequent ability to 
save most of their salary component and at the same time enjoy a very 
comfortable lifestyle.
However the number of such lucrative posts, particularly in the Asian 
region, has declined somewhat. This decline has been a result of: 
• 
The ongoing effect of the GFC and companies tightening expenditure and reducing     benefits.
• 
Increasing use of locals in lieu of expats.
• 
Worries over pay discrepancies between expats and local, as local standards 
rise.
• 
Improving economic conditions in many Asian countries mean that cities once 
considered hardship postings are no longer seen as such.
Today if you are looking for an expat posting in Asia with seriously 
good benefits, you need to look at roles that are located in areas which are 
relatively undeveloped economically and in countries classified as emerging 
economies. Such roles would be seen as genuine hardship postings and accordingly 
would receive benefits to ease the difficulties encountered. Such roles are not 
at all common and certainly are few compared to the past, although well rewarded 
expat roles do still exist in the Middle East.
Whilst many of the lucrative expat roles in Asia have disappeared there 
are still plenty of good career growing roles to be had in Asia. Benefits and/or 
perks should not be the primary reason to seek a role in the growing economies 
of Asia, compared to the career benefit of international exposure and learning. 
A 
stint in Singapore, Hong Kong, Shanghai or similar city can add a degree of 
lustre to your resume and is especially beneficial if you want to carve a career 
in any of the major multinational companies. Once you have become an expat, a 
wide world of opportunities can arise, including not just Asia, but South 
America and Africa, in addition to Europe and North America.
A 
drawback of an expat career is that once you are on the expat merry-go-round it 
can be hard to get off, especially if you are an Australian, as returning to 
Australia will often mean coming back to a diminished role in a somewhat static 
environment.
All things considered a stint overseas as an expat can do a good deal 
for you in advancing your career and when applying for such a role, the career 
development opportunities should be your first focus. With any "fringe benefits" 
seen as secondary items and certainly should not be the primary arbiters of your 
decision making process. We have seen circumstances where greed has diminished 
candidate’s opportunities and shrouded their true interests.
Any expat role must be viewed within the context of your plans for your 
career and private/family life.